育才学习网1.GMAT作文写多少字合适
在prep的作文界面，一行平均有18-20个单词，为简化计算，按每行20个单词来计算。注意，在这里，无论是完整的一行，还是只有几个单词的一行，都记为单独的一行，用来简化计算。凡是一行，都按20个单词来计算。这样，我们可以得出：三行的段落60个单词，四行的段落80个单词，五行的段落100个单词，以此类推。通常我们会写会写4-5个段落，建议每段不要少于3行，也不要要多于6行。有了这些数据，一眼扫下来，基本自己写了多少字就很清楚了。
GMAT作文字数要求
GMAT考试官方对GMAT作文的字数并没有明确地要求。但即使如此，考生也不要以为字数多就能分数高，因为这样的做法可能会适得其反。即使AWA写作没有规定明确的字数，但是据统计，大多数的高分作文字数还是集中在400+到550左右。考生只要能够对找出的逻辑错误给出全面深刻的反驳即可，没必要无话找话。但前提是考生一定要对题干中的逻辑错误理解到位，并尽可能的把里面所有的逻辑错误全部找出来。
GMAT作文写作的目的是为了将你的观点清晰的表达出来，并指出题干中论证的不足之处。所以在练习的时候，考生要注意段落之间的衔接，不要让它被孤立，否则会为你的写作减分。论述时保证每段在80字左右即可，用两到三句话把论点表达清楚即可，不要显得冗长。
2.GMAT作文字数多少字合适
The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper: Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money. Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion. 首段 This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. However, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesn't necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree. 中间段1 The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense. 中间段2 This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees. 中间段3 Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature. 末端 In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment (i.e., coal mine). Before any decision is made, all this things must be considered, not simply the reduction of payroll expenses. 1、字数高达599words， 充。
3.准备GMAT作文是背新概念四和模板还是背范文和模板
背诵新概念的文章对于整体提高英语水平，尤其是单词量和语感方面，有很大帮助，但对于GMAT写作几乎不会有什么用处，或者说性价比实在是太低了，花了太多的精力，提升了太少的分数。
GMAT写作相对来讲学习压力比较小，整个GMAT考试的难点都是在verbal上面，AWA是可以在临近考试的时候准备都来得及。你应该先花大力气在verbal的SC上面，因为SC做好了，才能真正明白GMAT所采用的语法体系，你写句子就应该不会出太多错误了。
比如说SC常考平行结构，等你把平行结构弄明白了，你自己写句子时也就不会出现平行结构的错误了啊。接下来应该再专攻一下CR，它让你明白GMAT所采用的逻辑体系是什么，学好了之后你就明白什么样的文章逻辑是清晰的。
此时你应该就已经能写出相当不错的语句和意群了。接下来在临近考试时专门看看GMAT写作的题库和范文，你会发现GMAT写作有相对固定的格式，因为它几乎不考察你写作文的优美程度，而是看你文章里所体现的critical thinking，所以一篇文字非常简单的作文也有可能拿到满分。
对于GMAT写作来说，比较需要准备的是瞬间找出文章语段中逻辑缺陷的能力，此处建议你看看前辈整理出来的常见错误，比如“七宗罪”。最后的最后，就是GMAT考试的机经很重要，考前一个月内……，你懂的……总之，GMAT写作很简单，没有你想的这么复杂。
相反倒是你之后学雅思写作的时候，哼哼……，难度可能会超出你的想象，考官给分真是奇低啊……。
4.GMAT写作字数要求是多少
gmat写作AWA写作没有要求长度或者字数，不过我们要对自己有一个gmat作文字数要求，写作重要是简洁，一般两段为佳。
所以最佳gmat作文建议：400-430 words。在AWA的写作中，无法全面的表达自己的观点或者看法。
但是在该段gmat作文结束之前，请先为自己一个问题：“接下来该怎么写？这些内容会对我的thesis有什么帮助？这个点为什么重要？”提醒：gmat作文写作的目的是为了将你的观点表达的丝丝入扣。所以在练习的时候，请注意你的观点之间的衔接，不要让它被孤立，这样会为你的写作减分的。
注意你的观点或论点前后的衔接，并且保证你每一段的论述大于2 sentences。 gmat考试技巧在写gmat作文的时候，你需要明确你就某一问题或观点的看法，这样会使你的文章重心突出。
注意在写gmat作文时，不要把你的论点当成一个问题，又抛给你的读者，而是要清晰的表达你的观点。如果你无法就某一argument or issue确定你的观点，请重新审视题目，对其中的提示性语言做出一个outline。
不断的练习，将是你在这一方面取得长足的进步。 尽管gmat考试不会考察你的business, history， 和时事的了解程度，但是你还需要有一定程度的了解。
否则，面对topic，也许你会哑口无言。你可以在你的AWA写gmat作文时，运用很多例子，关于history、current events、literature、your personal life、your work experience。
建议阅读：The Economist, The Wall Street Journal, or Business week。 在写gmat作文的时候，你不用刻意的注意标新立异，这样会让你看起来很不自然。
但是从很多方面来看，写作确实也是很表面，很需要艺术的。在写作中如何表述（Style）也是很重要的。
一篇好文章的标准：重点突出、进行对比，并且证明ideas之间的关系gmat考试技巧在gmat写作中，应该注意slang、exclamation points、rhetorical questions、cliches。gmat essay与日常的练习和交流是不一样的。
在AWA写作中，很多test-takers经常会使用广告词，这是应该避免的。 gmat考试如果你的gmat作文没有conclusion，会看起来完成的很仓卒，很粗燥，很有可能被认为是没有完成的。
但是这仅仅只是表面的。不要再文章结尾重述你的观点。
在文章的最后可以尝试引入一个新的与之相关的观点加入论述。仔细阅读AWA prompts，并且整理其大纲和论点。
你的大纲应该包括conclusion和the body paragraphs的内容。这一能力可以在日常的训练中练就。
利用反面观点是一种很好的手法——反面论证。在文中企图掩盖argument本身的weakness是没用的。
你的受众很可能已经了解了这一argument or issue的所有看法或者观点。此时，如果你通过反面论证将会让你的文章更出色。
反其道而行之，为你的essay添彩。希望可以帮到你！~。
5.你们写GMAT作文都是怎么论证的
GMAT是Graduate Management Admission Test的缩写，中文名称为经企管理研究生入学考试。
新GMAT写作时间，写作规定的时间为30分钟，完成一篇论证辨析（Analysis of an Argument），文章必须用英语完成，并用键盘输入电脑。新GMAT写作字数，官方没有要求长度或者字数，但是一般要求简洁，一般两段为佳。
字数在400-430 words左右。一般来说，6分的Argument字数一般为500左右，考生可以根据此来确定自己文章的字数，保证在答题过程中万无一失。
考生在写GMAT作文时一定要根据自己找出的逻辑错误进行针对性的反击，言之有物，不要单纯的堆砌字数，文章华而不实一定不会取得理想的分数。如何合理安排答题时间。
1）主动训练来摆脱因时间限制产生的不适感；2）让自己熟悉考试时的时间安排；3）找到自己的写作节奏；4）收集写作素材，做到对常考话题常见素材的熟悉；5）对于不同类型的文章模板要烂熟于胸。如何判断自己字数。
用过prep作文界面的考生应该都知道，一行平均有18-20个单词，为简化计算，按每行20个单词来计算。三行的段落60个单词，四行的段落80个单词，五行的段落100个单词，以此类推，如果文章有4-5个段落，建议每段不要少于3行，也不要多于6行。
6.GMAT作文字数多少字合适
The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper: Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money. Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion. 首段 This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. However, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesn't necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree. 中间段1 The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense. 中间段2 This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees. 中间段3 Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature. 末端 In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment (i.e., coal mine). Before any decision is made, all this things must be considered, not simply the reduction of payroll expenses. 1、字数高达599。
7.GMAT作文字数有多少
GMAT作文字数多少合适？下面是官方钦定满分的范文，其最明显的优点在于：1、字数高达599words， 充分体现了字数为王的判分倾向。
2、标准的五段制，首段、末端，中间三段，看上去很美。3、没有陈词滥调、满篇废话的模板式语言。
下面是一篇官方给出满分的ARGUMENT范文，我们来一起赏析，看看它为何能scored six。The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper:"Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money."Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.首段This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. However, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesn't necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree.中间段1The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense.中间段2This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.中间段3Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature.末端In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a co。
8.GMAT写作字数要求是多少
gmat写作AWA写作没有要求长度或者字数，不过我们要对自己有一个gmat作文字数要求，写作重要是简洁，一般两段为佳。所以最佳gmat作文建议：400-430
words。在AWA的写作中，无法全面的表达自己的观点或者看法。但是在该段gmat作文结束之前，请先为自己一个问题：“接下来该怎么写？这些内容会对我的thesis有什么帮助？这个点为什么重要？”提醒：gmat作文写作的目的是为了将你的观点表达的丝丝入扣。所以在练习的时候，请注意你的观点之间的衔接，不要让它被孤立，这样会为你的写作减分的。注意你的观点或论点前后的衔接，并且保证你每一段的论述大于2
sentences。
gmat考试技巧在写gmat作文的时候，你需要明确你就某一问题或观点的看法，这样会使你的文章重心突出。注意在写gmat作文时，不要把你的论点当成一个问题，又抛给你的读者，而是要清晰的表达你的观点。如果你无法就某一argument
or issue确定你的观点，请重新审视题目，对其中的提示性语言做出一个outline。不断的练习，将是你在这一方面取得长足的进步。
尽管gmat考试不会考察你的business, history,
和时事的了解程度，但是你还需要有一定程度的了解。否则，面对topic，也许你会哑口无言。你可以在你的AWA写gmat作文时，运用很多例子，关于history、current
events、literature、your personal life、your work experience。建议阅读：The Economist,
The Wall Street Journal, or Business week。
在写gmat作文的时候，你不用刻意的注意标新立异，这样会让你看起来很不自然。但是从很多方面来看，写作确实也是很表面，很需要艺术的。在写作中如何表述（Style）也是很重要的。一篇好文章的标准：重点突出、进行对比，并且证明ideas之间的关系gmat考试技巧在gmat写作中，应该注意slang、exclamation
points、rhetorical questions、cliches。gmat
essay与日常的练习和交流是不一样的。在AWA写作中，很多test-takers经常会使用广告词，这是应该避免的。
gmat考试如果你的gmat作文没有conclusion，会看起来完成的很仓卒，很粗燥，很有可能被认为是没有完成的。但是这仅仅只是表面的。不要再文章结尾重述你的观点。在文章的最后可以尝试引入一个新的与之相关的观点加入论述。仔细阅读AWA
prompts，并且整理其大纲和论点。你的大纲应该包括conclusion和the body
paragraphs的内容。这一能力可以在日常的训练中练就。利用反面观点是一种很好的手法——反面论证。在文中企图掩盖argument本身的weakness是没用的。你的受众很可能已经了解了这一argument
or issue的所有看法或者观点。此时，如果你通过反面论证将会让你的文章更出色。反其道而行之，为你的essay添彩。希望可以帮到你！~